Lovely Scenery, But Walks Getting Boring

Lovely Scenery, But Walks Getting Boring

Unless I drive somewhere new, it’s not much fun to just step out the door and wander. But driving to go for a walk seems a tad ridiculous.

I

t’ll be better for the dogs, I reasoned when I moved from the city to a moshav, a type of agricultural community. And yes it is, and the scenery around Even Sapir is lovely to the point of spectacular, but the walks are getting boring, most especially at night.

At first it was exciting to follow all the paths in the vicinity and discover the delightful vistas and spots to which they led. At the bottom of my hill is the Israel National Trail, which runs from the north to the south of the entire country, its path chosen for scenic highlights. In almost every direction outside the moshav there are lovely walks. Still, I walk less often with the dogs than when living in the city.

One reason is that walks are no longer necessary. The front door is always open here and the dogs can wander in and out at will so they can do their excretory business whenever they like. The thing is, I like going for walks with the dogs.

Unless I turn the walk into a big hike, leaving the moshav and going into the surrounding countryside or driving somewhere new, it’s not much fun to just step out the door and wander. Back in Tel Aviv I was certainly getting tired of the same old spots, but although it’s pleasant to walk around the circuit of the moshav, it’s getting very dull. During the day it’s nice, you can look at the spectacular hills around, but at night there’s nothing to see, and barely any life.

Yes, I can jump in the car and we can go for a walk in any nook and cranny of nearby Jerusalem (we’re a scenic 15-minute drive from the city), but it’s not quite the same as being able to just step outside the house and walk the city. I reason that I won’t be here long, so not to worry, but that’s not a good attitude; it’s all the more reason, arguably, to suck the juice out of where I am, to make sure to go on good walks in the relatively short time I’m going to be here.

The last time we drove into town for a dog walk was about a month ago. It was good in that we did find something new, but again, driving to go for a walk seems a tad ridiculous. I parked outside the Mount Zion Hotel and walked down through Mishkenot Sha’ananim and the surrounding parks, a place which I find boring and even irritating, then across Sultan’s Pool to the walls of the Old City, where, fabulous reader, we did rekindle our walking explorations. I discovered it’s possible to walk all along the outside of the Old City walls; it’s a rocky grassy park, and that was great.

Grand Jerusalem

After arriving at the Jewish Quarter we circled back down the valley past the music college and up past the Cinematheque again and down into Emek Refa’im, where the Saturday night crowds were still hanging about and I bought a slice of pizza. Which felt pretty miserable, as I barely know anyone in this city. Then back to the car.

Yes, there were ten delightful exciting minutes at the foot of the Old City walls, but I wouldn’t do it again, because the rest was such a drag. I have to say, especially now that it’s quite cold at nights, I am missing Tel Aviv. I’m missing the bicycle- and rollerblade-friendly flatness of the topography. I’m missing the commercial density.

I like quiet, but I’m a city boy. How to reconcile the two?

The Trail

Sunday, June 21st, 2026

The Software Architect Elevator: Redefining the Architect’s Role in the Digital Enterprise

Gregor Hohpe

Engaging, pleasant, timely and knowing, I was nonetheless somewhat disappointed by the thinness of this book. That said, I’m about to read his next one, Platform Strategy, which is really is the one I wanted to read.

In his Contraptions substack, Venkatesh Rao notes an obvious split that I never fully saw: thinky versus writerly writers:

Those who write to think typically resist any attempt to change the content of what they’re saying, but generally don’t care about style, verbal precision, tightening, and pragmatic cutting suggestions to hit word-count limits.

Those who write to write are typically attached to every word and comma, but can be surprisingly indifferent to substantial content edits and highly open to saying entirely different things than they originally set out to.

I must be mostly of the latter, affirmed by my not having thought enough across the decades to even note the schism.

That said, the best writing is where the thinking may be primary but the author has been an artist over the supporting form.

Wednesday, June 17th, 2026

Amit Segal, longer than usual for his It’s Noon in Israel newsletter, posits the perennial faultline in Israel politics: Jewish vs Israeli.

“Jewish” and “Israeli” are simply the two tenets of Israel’s self-definition as a Jewish and democratic state ⁠— not in open contradiction, since most Israelis hold both, but forever rubbing against each other. Like asking whether strawberry-banana yogurt is more strawberry or banana, Israelis are endlessly asked, in one disguise or another, whether they are slightly more Jewish than democratic or the reverse. Once you see it, most of the news in the country ⁠— most push notifications, most studio shouting matches ⁠— dissolves into that same question, with a thin veneer of fresh event on top.

Segal himself straddles the divide nicely, as does the society writ large, part and parcel of the fading Ashkenazi/Sephardi divide. In my thin slice of observation, secular Israelis who delight in eating swine abroad now light candles and recite more complete prayers at home for Friday night dinner than they used to ⁠— indeed holding Friday night dinner itself is the gateway. And there are so many gateways.

I do however take issue with Amit’s characterization of the Israeli/left side:

Of course we are Jewish, the left answers ⁠— the flag is essentially a prayer shawl, the emblem is the Temple menorah, every kindergartner comes home Friday with a challah ⁠— but that is the décor, not the purpose; the purpose is to be the only democracy in the Middle East.

Instead, it seems to me that people on this side, those of the “villa in the jungle” view, would rather just forget about the jungle; being “the only X in the Middle East” is merely apologetics, not identity. Rather, it’s about being a liberal democracy simply because that is the enlightened, obvious, natural thing to be; anyone with a Yiddisher kopf can see that. And as for the Right downgrading democracy to merely being the operating system, well, that’s what Judaism itself arguably is too, so being the OS is no small thing.