Shinui and the Seven-Year Itch

Shinui and the Seven-Year Itch

How refreshing to see Asian faces out shopping in Tel Aviv, or Africans riding the bus to Ra’anana. With them Israel is given fresh wellsprings of culture.

O

ne of the riches of great modern cities is their diverse ethnicity. Every church-goer, out in his Sunday, Saturday, or any day best, is a boon to all. People bring with them only the select ways of their mother country; the rest fall by the wayside if the new land does it better. South Tel Aviv is now a mishmash of African and Asian faces. It has an increasing number of Asian markets, with small grocery shops near the old bus station stocking a myriad of delicious Thai goods. They are priced to sell ⁠— not as exotics for the wealthy, but as staples to relatively low-income earners. Which means the rest of society can inexpensively try them, should it wish. How refreshing to see Asian faces out shopping in Tel Aviv, or Africans riding the bus to Ra’anana. With them Israel is given fresh wellsprings of culture. It strengthens Israel’s ties to elsewhere, makes it a more closely-knit part of the family of nations, and an attractive destination at that. The diversity of the people subjecting themselves to a country’s laws is the ultimate way to augment a state’s venerability.

Like most everyone else, Israelis adore Thailand, and they flock there; Bangkok is Israel’s gateway to the East. And yet Thais are not welcome to settle here in any numbers at all. I once heard Ephraim Sneh say that the foreign workers he prefers importing are Thais because they don’t want to stay. Well, that is a misguided view. Not all Israelis need be Jews, and not all non-Jewish Israelis need be Arabs. In fact, it would be a whole lot healthier if Arabs were not the sole minority. Jewish Israelis should grasp the point that unlike Arabs, non-Muslim immigrants from around the world have absolutely no desire to nor interest in undermining the State of Israel. They merely want to live, work and bring up their children here. This should somehow be permitted, even welcomed, under a well-planned naturalization program. Becoming Jewish should not be the only mechanism for becoming Israeli.

Jacob laboured for seven years to win Rebeccah’s hand. He then toiled another seven, without argument, out of deference to the trickiness of his father-in-law (incidentally a virtue, if we can call it that, which the Thais in particular would admire). If persons currently residing in Israel can prove today they have been here for seven years, regardless of whether they were here at some point illegally, and they have no police record, they should be taught the words of Hatikvah, get all the answers right in a quiz about the Declaration of Independence, and be bestowed with citizenship in a group ceremony with their class.

Naturalization need not be Aliyah. Cosy benefits and tax breaks need not apply. But it is an ugly sight that Israel is deporting people who merely want to live and work here. Make them citizens. Collect their taxes.

Having limited but thriving and contributing communities from around the world can only strengthen Israel’s bilateral trade ties, which can only improve the choice of goods available to the Israeli consumer, which is one of the pillars of what makes a place somewhere a good to live.

Shinui (“change”) now has the ministry of the interior, and we’re beginning to see these changes take place. The House of Israel should welcome the kingdom once known as Siam with a smile worthy of the Land of Smiles.

The Trail

Sunday, June 21st, 2026

The Software Architect Elevator: Redefining the Architect’s Role in the Digital Enterprise

Gregor Hohpe

Engaging, pleasant, timely and knowing, I was nonetheless somewhat disappointed by the thinness of this book. That said, I’m about to read his next one, Platform Strategy, which is really is the one I wanted to read.

In his Contraptions substack, Venkatesh Rao notes an obvious split that I never fully saw: thinky versus writerly writers:

Those who write to think typically resist any attempt to change the content of what they’re saying, but generally don’t care about style, verbal precision, tightening, and pragmatic cutting suggestions to hit word-count limits.

Those who write to write are typically attached to every word and comma, but can be surprisingly indifferent to substantial content edits and highly open to saying entirely different things than they originally set out to.

I must be mostly of the latter, affirmed by my not having thought enough across the decades to even note the schism.

That said, the best writing is where the thinking may be primary but the author has been an artist over the supporting form.

Wednesday, June 17th, 2026

Amit Segal, longer than usual for his It’s Noon in Israel newsletter, posits the perennial faultline in Israel politics: Jewish vs Israeli.

“Jewish” and “Israeli” are simply the two tenets of Israel’s self-definition as a Jewish and democratic state ⁠— not in open contradiction, since most Israelis hold both, but forever rubbing against each other. Like asking whether strawberry-banana yogurt is more strawberry or banana, Israelis are endlessly asked, in one disguise or another, whether they are slightly more Jewish than democratic or the reverse. Once you see it, most of the news in the country ⁠— most push notifications, most studio shouting matches ⁠— dissolves into that same question, with a thin veneer of fresh event on top.

Segal himself straddles the divide nicely, as does the society writ large, part and parcel of the fading Ashkenazi/Sephardi divide. In my thin slice of observation, secular Israelis who delight in eating swine abroad now light candles and recite more complete prayers at home for Friday night dinner than they used to ⁠— indeed holding Friday night dinner itself is the gateway. And there are so many gateways.

I do however take issue with Amit’s characterization of the Israeli/left side:

Of course we are Jewish, the left answers ⁠— the flag is essentially a prayer shawl, the emblem is the Temple menorah, every kindergartner comes home Friday with a challah ⁠— but that is the décor, not the purpose; the purpose is to be the only democracy in the Middle East.

Instead, it seems to me that people on this side, those of the “villa in the jungle” view, would rather just forget about the jungle; being “the only X in the Middle East” is merely apologetics, not identity. Rather, it’s about being a liberal democracy simply because that is the enlightened, obvious, natural thing to be; anyone with a Yiddisher kopf can see that. And as for the Right downgrading democracy to merely being the operating system, well, that’s what Judaism itself arguably is too, so being the OS is no small thing.