For Love of Economy

For Love of Economy

It disturbs me to be driving a car that gets fewer kilometers to the shekel than did my previous.

Y

es, the engine is more powerful and I am now at least equal to any other car on the road in terms of stamina up the hills and overtaking power, but these seem trivial reasons to make the most fundamental aspect of driving, eating up the miles, a more expensive proposition [Update 2016 Apr 3: Well, my young man, not entirely trivial; sometimes you need that power if only just for safety reasons]. It disturbs me to be driving a car that I know gets fewer kilometers to the shekel than did my previous.

My last car was a Fiat Uno with a 1000cc engine; this one has a 1392cc engine. Before, I got about 320km for every NIS 100 worth of gasoline; now I get about 270km. That is a substantial difference, and for what? It marginally pains me, it really does. And even this is good fuel economy. People who drive 4x4s and heavy big cars ⁠— and there are lots of them here in Israel where both cars and gasoline are expensive ⁠— must downright chug the shekels. When driving along the highway alongside a much smaller car, I can understand people feeling superior because their car is sexier, but don’t people feel a tinge of idiocy that to cross that kilometer they are paying more for really no good reason? I mean, fine, I can accept paying more to initially purchase a nicer car, but thereafter paying more per kilometer once you’ve bought it?

I suppose one adjusts to the level of expense. If you’re riding a bicycle, you’re not paying anything in fuel at all, making the difference between a small and a big car trivial. But still, riding a bike is a totally different thing to driving a car, whereas driving a big car is almost identical to driving a small fuel-efficient one.

Also, I feel sort of idiotic driving alone in a car that has enough space and power to be carrying four more people. Seeing just one person driving in even a small car, let alone a big one, looks ridiculous to me.

The Trail

Sunday, June 21st, 2026

The Software Architect Elevator: Redefining the Architect’s Role in the Digital Enterprise

Gregor Hohpe

Engaging, pleasant, timely and knowing, I was nonetheless somewhat disappointed by the thinness of this book. That said, I’m about to read his next one, Platform Strategy, which is the one I wanted to read in the first place.

In his Contraptions substack, Venkatesh Rao notes an obvious split that I never fully saw: thinky versus writerly writers:

Those who write to think typically resist any attempt to change the content of what they’re saying, but generally don’t care about style, verbal precision, tightening, and pragmatic cutting suggestions to hit word-count limits.

Those who write to write are typically attached to every word and comma, but can be surprisingly indifferent to substantial content edits and highly open to saying entirely different things than they originally set out to.

I must be mostly of the latter, affirmed by my not having thought enough across the decades to even note the schism.

That said, the best writing is where the thinking may be primary but the author has been an artist over the supporting form.

Wednesday, June 17th, 2026

Amit Segal, longer than usual for his It’s Noon in Israel newsletter, posits the perennial faultline in Israel politics: Jewish vs Israeli.

“Jewish” and “Israeli” are simply the two tenets of Israel’s self-definition as a Jewish and democratic state ⁠— not in open contradiction, since most Israelis hold both, but forever rubbing against each other. Like asking whether strawberry-banana yogurt is more strawberry or banana, Israelis are endlessly asked, in one disguise or another, whether they are slightly more Jewish than democratic or the reverse. Once you see it, most of the news in the country ⁠— most push notifications, most studio shouting matches ⁠— dissolves into that same question, with a thin veneer of fresh event on top.

Segal himself straddles the divide nicely, as does the society writ large, part and parcel of the fading Ashkenazi/Sephardi divide. In my thin slice of observation, secular Israelis who delight in eating swine abroad now light candles and recite more complete prayers at home for Friday night dinner than they used to ⁠— indeed holding Friday night dinner itself is the gateway. And there are so many gateways.

I do however take issue with Amit’s characterization of the Israeli/left side:

Of course we are Jewish, the left answers ⁠— the flag is essentially a prayer shawl, the emblem is the Temple menorah, every kindergartner comes home Friday with a challah ⁠— but that is the décor, not the purpose; the purpose is to be the only democracy in the Middle East.

Instead, it seems to me that people on this side, those of the “villa in the jungle” view, would rather just forget about the jungle; being “the only X in the Middle East” is merely apologetics, not identity. Rather, it’s about being a liberal democracy simply because that is the enlightened, obvious, natural thing to be; anyone with a Yiddisher kopf can see that. And as for the Right downgrading democracy to merely being the operating system, well, that’s what Judaism itself arguably is too, so being the OS is no small thing.